GLYPO-001

Build Update 3 – Complete

I was quite proud with my progress detailed in the last post: Build Update 2 – Painting. With the motor/fin assembly now firmly bonded in place with copious amounts of epoxy, I shared a photo with a colleague of mine. He just so happens to have expert experience with high-powered model rocketry. Initially he seemed impressed. I then asked him about my plans to attach the cord for the parachute…

Completed airframe

Build Update 2 – Painting

I started drafting this post in early April, straight after Build Update 1. Since then I have published the dilemma with the motor in “My motor choice went up in smoke”. Throughout the motor reselection process I was progressing the build, thus this post spans the build progress from April to now, mid-May.

Experimenting with paint

At this point, in early April, I had applied my first coat of yellow paint (Humbrol 69). A single can of spray paint was wildly optimistic for a model of this size. I had quite crudely cut the slots in the phenolic body tube and fit-tested the motor and fin assembly. It looked as such:

My motor choice went up in smoke

Recap: A plan that hang-fired

I briefly covered my initial motor choice in the ‘Rocket Design’ blog post. For my rocket, GLYPO-001, I required a G-class motor that I could fly at my ‘local’ club FOG, and a more powerful H-class that I would fly elsewhere in the UK with a UKRA (UK Rocketry Association) certified RSO (Range Safety Officer).

I was not looking for altitude, I was looking for a nice dramatic slow launch. The Cesaroni AP (Ammonium Perchlorate) motors seemed ideal. They have some long-burn grains that I hoped would deliver the right stuff. By way of comparison, the Cesaroni Pro29 G-class motors (80–160 N·s) with three-grain refills have an average burn duration of 1.8 seconds across the range. They offer high-velocity grains that burn as quickly as 0.4 seconds, all the way to very slow-burn motors that last 4.4 seconds (Mellow).

Build Update 1

This is a short, photo-heavy update showing the build progress so far.

OpenRocket produced some very helpful 1:1 scale PDF exports that made sizing the fins straightforward. The centring rings were also included in the export, but I opted to buy those pre-cut from Black Cat Rocketry.

OpenRocket fin and centring ring layout Initial fin cutting
Fins clamped for sanding Sanded fins

Marking the fin tab interface

To mark the fin tab interface accurately but simply, I sketched the motor mount geometry in LibreCAD and printed it as a physical template.

Bill of Materials

Unsurprisingly, model rocketry is a niche hobby. That said, there are a number of shops across the UK, both bricks-and-mortar and online, that sell components for typical small black powder rockets (A–C class), which can be flown from a playing field.

The building and flying of large model rockets represents a much smaller subsection of this already limited market, which significantly restricts component availability.

Through internet searches and recommendations from colleagues, I identified a handful of UK suppliers and, thankfully, managed to procure almost everything domestically. As expected, the United States offers a much wider range of options.

Rocket Design

Background & Requirements

I am hoping to attain my UKRA (UK Rocketry Association) Level 1 and Level 2 certifications, allowing me to launch high impulse (powerful) model rockets. I plan to start with an H-class rocket, the lowest motor impulse for a Level 1 rocket, and work my way up.

My local club, Fins over Gwent (FOG), billed as Wales’ premier rocketry club, is about 1.5 hours from my home in SW England. FOG issue a NOTAM (Notice to Airmen — a warning to pilots) that extends to 3,500 ft and is issued before each monthly club meet.